Re: psql display of foreign keys

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql display of foreign keys
Date: 2019-01-02 20:38:40
Message-ID: 34258172-638e-38b7-7ef0-2c1e0e510b87@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/12/2018 23:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:26:30PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> That means I can just get pg_partition_root() done first, and try to
>> write the queries using that instead of WITH RECURSIVE.
>
> FWIW, I was just writing a patch about this one, so I was going to spawn
> a new thread today :)
>
> Let's definitely avoid WITH RECURSIVE if we can.

I'm setting this to "Waiting on Author", awaiting a new version based on
pg_partition_root() once that one is done.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-02 20:44:49 Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-02 20:30:04 Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default?