From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql display of foreign keys |
Date: | 2019-01-02 20:38:40 |
Message-ID: | 34258172-638e-38b7-7ef0-2c1e0e510b87@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/12/2018 23:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:26:30PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> That means I can just get pg_partition_root() done first, and try to
>> write the queries using that instead of WITH RECURSIVE.
>
> FWIW, I was just writing a patch about this one, so I was going to spawn
> a new thread today :)
>
> Let's definitely avoid WITH RECURSIVE if we can.
I'm setting this to "Waiting on Author", awaiting a new version based on
pg_partition_root() once that one is done.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-02 20:44:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-02 20:30:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |