Re: Strange time zone +00:53:28

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karsten Düsterloh <pg-bugs-ml(at)tal(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange time zone +00:53:28
Date: 2013-05-10 13:10:38
Message-ID: 3414.1368191438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karsten_D=FCsterloh?= <pg-bugs-ml(at)tal(dot)de> writes:
> Under Pg 8.3, we used the timestamp
> 0001-01-01 00:00:00+01
> as an easy-to-remember marker for 'dunno, but predates any usual
> business dates' for fields of type timestamp with time zone.

Have you considered using '-infinity'?

> With Pg 9.1, these timestamps now appear as
> 0001-12-31 23:53:28+00:53:28 BC

This is not a bug. I refer you to the IANA timezone database's entry
for Europe/Berlin:

# Zone NAME GMTOFF RULES FORMAT [UNTIL]
Zone Europe/Berlin 0:53:28 - LMT 1893 Apr
1:00 C-Eur CE%sT 1945 May 24 2:00
1:00 SovietZone CE%sT 1946
1:00 Germany CE%sT 1980
1:00 EU CE%sT

which says that timekeeping before April 1893 was done according to
local mean solar time, 53:28 east of Greenwich; so a timestamp specified
as midnight GMT+1 comes out as 23:53:28 local time. Now, I agree that
it's somewhat debatable to extend that rule clear back to 1 AD; but it's
more sensible than believing that local time would ever have been
taken as exactly GMT+1 before the days of standardized timezones.

The only reason 8.3 and before didn't do what you're seeing is they
were incapable of applying timezone rules outside the range of 32-bit
time_t (ie, back to about 1901). We fixed that code to be 64-bit,
and now it does what the timezone definition says.

If you're inextricably wedded to using '0001-01-01 00:00:00+01', you
might consider building yourself a custom timezone database that has
an entry defined the way you want. But personally I'd recommend
changing to something less randomly chosen.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-05-10 15:49:18 Re: Inconsistency between TO_CHAR() and TO_NUMBER()
Previous Message Curd Reinert 2013-05-10 13:08:21 Re: Strange time zone +00:53:28