From: | nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Franck Routier <franck(dot)routier(at)axege(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? |
Date: | 2013-04-04 19:05:52 |
Message-ID: | 341110C9-21FF-4379-9103-B58B60F81138@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Franck Routier <franck(dot)routier(at)axege(dot)com> wrote:
> Le 04/04/2013 18:25, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> Franck Routier <franck(dot)routier(at)axege(dot)com> writes:
>>> Right, explain alone takes 3.6 seconds, so the time really seems to go
>>> query planning...
>> Well, you've not shown us the query, so it's all going to be
>> speculation. But maybe you have some extremely expensive function that
>> the planner is evaluating to fold to a constant, or something like that?
>> The generated plan isn't terribly complicated, but we can't see what
>> was required to produce it.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
> The request is not using any function. It looks like this:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM sanrss
> LEFT JOIN sanrum ON sanrum.sanrum___rforefide = sanrss.sanrss___rforefide AND sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide = sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide AND sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside = sanrss.sanrsside
> LEFT JOIN sanact ON sanact.sanact___rforefide = sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sanact.sanact___rfovsnide = sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sanact.sanact___sanrsside = sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide = sanrum.sanrumide AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide IS NOT NULL AND sanact.sanact___rsanopide='CCAM'
> LEFT JOIN sandia ON sandia.sandia___rforefide = sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sandia.sandia___rfovsnide = sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sandia.sandia___sanrsside = sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sandia.sandia___sanrumide = sanrum.sanrumide AND sandia.sandiasig=1
> LEFT JOIN saneds ON sanrss.sanrss___rforefide = saneds.saneds___rforefide AND sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide = saneds.saneds___rfovsnide AND sanrss.sanrss___sanedside = saneds.sanedside
> LEFT JOIN rsaidp ON saneds.saneds___rforefide = rsaidp.rsaidp___rforefide AND saneds.saneds___rsaidpide = rsaidp.rsaidpide
> WHERE sanrss.sanrss___rforefide = 'CHCL' AND sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide = '201012_600' AND sanrss.sanrsside = '1188100'
> ORDER BY sanrum.sanrumord, sanrum.sanrumide
>
> Schema looks like this :
> rsaidp
> |
> v
> sanrss --------
> | |
> v v
> sanrum sandia
> |
> v
> sanact
>
>
> Primary keys are most made of several varchars. Foreign keys do exist. Query is getting these data for one specific sanrss.
> This used to take around 50ms to execute, and is now taking 3.5 seconds. And it looks like this is spent computing a query plan...
>
> I also tried: PREPARE qry(id) as select ....
> The prepare takes 3.5 seconds. Execute qry(value) takes a few milliseconds...
>
> Regards,
> Franck
Is it only this query or all queries?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-04 19:08:52 | Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? |
Previous Message | Franck Routier | 2013-04-04 18:49:24 | Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? |