Re: 9.2 upgrade glitch with search_path

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 upgrade glitch with search_path
Date: 2013-01-15 21:32:48
Message-ID: 3411.1358285568@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:51:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> pg_dump does not dump/restore database properties, only database
>> contents. Properties are the responsibility of pg_dumpall, which
>> you bypassed (for databases anyway).

> Isn't this a bug? Seems there is no way to get these exported without
> pg_dumpall non-'g' mode.

No, it's not a bug. It is something that'd be nice to make more
flexible, but "bug" is an inappropriate pejorative. (If you are
unsure about the dividing line, ask yourself if we'd back-patch
such a change.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-01-15 22:30:18 Re: [SQL] Curious problem of using BETWEEN with start and end being the same versus EQUALS '='
Previous Message Chris Angelico 2013-01-15 21:10:26 Re: plpython intermittent ImportErrors