Re: fork/exec

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fork/exec
Date: 2004-02-01 23:04:26
Message-ID: 3411.1075676666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> (This code is getting rather intricate.

It needs rewritten. The hacks inserted for ExecBackend have largely
destroyed the former structure (such as it was), and the lack of any
commentary added with said hacks didn't help. I am thinking of tackling
that rewrite once the dust has settled.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • fork/exec at 2004-02-01 22:28:22 from Andrew Dunstan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-01 23:07:51 Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-01 22:39:35 Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory