From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: initdb / bootstrap design |
Date: | 2022-02-16 20:42:03 |
Message-ID: | 3404857.1645044123@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-02-16 13:24:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I remembered the reason why it's done that way: if we replaced those
>> values during genbki.pl, the contents of postgres.bki would become
>> architecture-dependent, belying its distribution as a "share" file.
> Hm. Architecturally I still would like to move it to be processed server
> side. I'd like to eventually get rid of single user mode (but keep bootstrap,
> at least for longer).
> Seems we could make NAMEDATALEN, FLOAT8PASSBYVAL, ALIGNOF_POINTER,
> FLOAT8PASSBYVAL stuff that bootparse knows about? And remove the need for
> POSTGRES, ENCODING, LC_COLLATE, LC_CTYPE as discussed already?
Yeah, I have no objection to doing it that way. It should be possible
to do those substitutions on a per-field basis, which'd be cleaner than
what initdb does now ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-02-16 20:46:28 | killing perl2host |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-16 20:31:16 | Re: Time to drop plpython2? |