From: | "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problems with 8.3 |
Date: | 2008-03-08 05:23:13 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f0803072123n1b9da52bre2e27bc9641efe13@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Well - I know that my stored proc is segfaulting based on a strace of
postgresql. Don't know how that affects trac which isn't using that
stored proc... the mystery continues. Either way I didn't get a
corefile, and ulimit -a show I have unlimited core file size :(
Alex
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well - I think it might be that some of my servlets weren't closing
> their database connections properly.
>
> I do have some new evidence though:
>
> I did an strace of the tomcat processes, and I noticed something that
> might be odd, but I'm not really qualified to say. I notice that
> every time a socket sends a request to Postgresql it gets some kind of
> reply. This is true in all cases EXCEPT when the application crashes.
> Here is the segment of the strace right before it throws a wobbly:
>
>
> [pid 4565] socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 156
> [pid 4565] bind(156, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
> [pid 4565] getsockname(156, {sa_family=AF_INET,
> sin_port=htons(56550), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, [16]) = 0
> [pid 4565] connect(156, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(5432),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
> [pid 4565] setsockopt(156, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0
> [pid 4565] send(156, "\0\0\0W\0\3\0\0user\0postgres\0database\0t"...,
> 87, 0) = 87
> [pid 4565] recv(156,
> "R\0\0\0\10\0\0\0\0S\0\0\0\34client_encoding\0UN"..., 8192, 0) = 279
> [pid 4565] gettimeofday({1204948966, 386187}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 4565] send(156, "P\0\0\1\35\0\r\n \t\tselect"...,
> 334, 0) = 334
> [pid 4565] recv(156, "", 8192, 0) = 0
> [pid 4565] send(156, "X\0\0\0\4", 5, 0) = 5
> [pid 4565] dup2(11, 156) = 156
> [pid 4565] close(156) = 0
>
>
> Notice that the recv(156,... after sending the query comes back blank
> which seems odd given that we just sent a query to the database.
>
> I'm really in bind with this one. It started happening a couple of
> days ago at this point, and all our admin applications are basically
> down :(, people can't even log the bugs that this is generating
> because the bugtrac (trac) is running on this postgresql and is
> throwing errors too.
>
> I also caught something else that seemed wierd on another trace:
>
> [pid 3553] send(28, "P\0\0\0H\0delete from result_cache w"..., 108, 0) = 108
> [pid 3553] recv(28, "N\0\0\1\202SWARNING\0C57P02\0Mterminatin"...,
> 8192, 0) = 387
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 977641}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 977682}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 977766}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 977902}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 977973}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 978012}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 978053}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] gettimeofday({1204946902, 978091}, NULL) = 0
> [pid 3553] recv(28, "", 8192, 0) = 0
> [pid 3553] send(28, "X\0\0\0\4", 5, 0) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
> [pid 3553] --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
> [pid 3553] rt_sigreturn(0x9) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
>
> I couldn't reproduce this though. It just randomly throws a SIGPIPE
> after the query. The other wierd thing is that this process also
> throws a SIGSEGV at another point. I wasn't expecting tomcat to
> crash, so alas I didn't capture a core file. I guess I should set the
> system default up.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I didn't. And after the reboot, I still see 8 new sockets stuck in
> > > CLOSE_WAIT - I'm wondering if this is a hardware/kernel problem...
> >
> > Having sockets in CLOSE_WAIT is actually pretty normal
> >
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-03-08 09:30:47 | Re: Watch your PlanetPostgreSQL.org blogs |
Previous Message | Alex Turner | 2008-03-08 04:42:52 | Re: Problems with 8.3 |