From: | "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 8.3 broke everything |
Date: | 2008-02-22 02:28:49 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f0802211828p57d6aa54odb963ed5ea53f4cc@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yeah - I reckon that would do it ;)
And it did break just about every website on our systems! Though the
change is understandable
Alex
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:49:29 -0500
>
> "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > Yeah - I pressed tab to indent my code, and of course it tabbed to the
> > next element on the page, which was the send button, then I hit a key,
> > and it sent the message before I was ready. I tested my hypothesis,
> > but it was wrong. I haven't quite figured it out yet. Something to
> > do with casting a char to an int I think, but I can't reproduce it
>
> Based on this I bet you are being nailed by:
>
>
> #
>
> Non-character data types are no longer automatically cast to TEXT
> (Peter, Tom)
>
> Previously, if a non-character value was supplied to an operator or
> function that requires text input, it was automatically cast to text,
> for most (though not all) built-in data types. This no longer happens:
> an explicit cast to text is now required for all non-character-string
> types. For example, these expressions formerly worked:
>
> substr(current_date, 1, 4)
> 23 LIKE '2%'
>
> but will now draw "function does not exist" and "operator does not
> exist" errors respectively. Use an explicit cast instead:
>
> substr(current_date::text, 1, 4)
> 23::text LIKE '2%'
>
> (Of course, you can use the more verbose CAST() syntax too.) The reason
> for the change is that these automatic casts too often caused
> surprising behavior. An example is that in previous releases, this
> expression was accepted but did not do what was expected:
>
> current_date < 2017-11-17
>
> This is actually comparing a date to an integer, which should be (and
> now is) rejected — but in the presence of automatic casts both sides
> were cast to text and a textual comparison was done, because the text <
> text operator was able to match the expression when no other < operator
> could.
>
> Types char(n) and varchar(n) still cast to text automatically. Also,
> automatic casting to text still works for inputs to the concatenation
> (||) operator, so long as least one input is a character-string type.
>
>
>
> - --
>
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHviIeATb/zqfZUUQRAlyKAJ46gSgeP5dKS+CXba/lBhBL5dev1QCdEfGF
> mZtO5L9dK2nAZZU4Cp6K+sA=
> =HTW2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 2008-02-22 02:49:49 | client_encoding |
Previous Message | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 2008-02-22 02:09:42 | Re: need some help on figuring out how to write a query |