From: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ulrich Wisser <ulrich(dot)wisser(at)relevanttraffic(dot)se> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need for speed |
Date: | 2005-08-16 17:59:53 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f050816105957ae5d6f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Are you calculating aggregates, and if so, how are you doing it (I ask
the question from experience of a similar application where I found
that my aggregating PGPLSQL triggers were bogging the system down, and
changed them so scheduled jobs instead).
Alex Turner
NetEconomist
On 8/16/05, Ulrich Wisser <ulrich(dot)wisser(at)relevanttraffic(dot)se> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> one of our services is click counting for on line advertising. We do
> this by importing Apache log files every five minutes. This results in a
> lot of insert and delete statements. At the same time our customers
> shall be able to do on line reporting.
>
> We have a box with
> Linux Fedora Core 3, Postgres 7.4.2
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
> 2 scsi 76GB disks (15.000RPM, 2ms)
>
> I did put pg_xlog on another file system on other discs.
>
> Still when several users are on line the reporting gets very slow.
> Queries can take more then 2 min.
>
> I need some ideas how to improve performance in some orders of
> magnitude. I already thought of a box with the whole database on a ram
> disc. So really any idea is welcome.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
>
> --
> Ulrich Wisser / System Developer
>
> RELEVANT TRAFFIC SWEDEN AB, Riddarg 17A, SE-114 57 Sthlm, Sweden
> Direct (+46)86789755 || Cell (+46)704467893 || Fax (+46)86789769
> ________________________________________________________________
> http://www.relevanttraffic.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mudfoot | 2005-08-16 18:00:08 | Re: choosing RAID level for xlogs |
Previous Message | Roger Hand | 2005-08-16 17:46:46 | Query plan looks OK, but slow I/O - settings advice? |