From: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Kratz <chris(dot)kratz(at)vistashare(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hosting Service Recommendations |
Date: | 2005-04-25 15:04:27 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f0504250804474c08da@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have found that even the larger hosting companies such as Rackspace
are pretty clueless when trying to configure even a mid size database
server. They gave us a 4 drive raid 5 even after being explicitly
asked for a RAID 10. They also put the controller in write through
cache mode. Pretty bad config - the server blew chunks, our single
drive ATA cheapo box ran significantly faster.
I would definatley suggest looking at co-lo.
Alex Turner
netEconomist
On 4/25/05, Chris Kratz <chris(dot)kratz(at)vistashare(dot)com> wrote:
> It seems the consensus on this list is that when running postgres, Opterons
> outperform Xeons by a significant margin not to mention the CS storms
> postgres seems to cause on Xeons. We are looking for a hosting service for a
> postgresql based application. Unfortunately, it seems most services
> standardize on Dell and by extension Xeon hardware. Do anyone have
> recommendations for hosting services that would be able to provide Opteron
> based hardware and have decent service? Or are we stuck with Xeons?
> --
> Chris Kratz
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2005-04-25 15:17:02 | Re: timezone() with timeofday() converts the wrong direction? |
Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2005-04-25 15:02:43 | OpenRPT (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 24 2005 ==) |