From: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? |
Date: | 2005-01-20 21:35:12 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f05012013354ebf8bd8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
How do you create a temporary view that has only a small subset of the
data from the DB init? (Links to docs are fine - I can read ;). My
query isn't all that complex, and my number of records might be from
10 to 2k depending on how I implement it.
Alex Turner
NetEconomist
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:00:06 -0500, Merlin Moncure
<merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> wrote:
> > I am also very interesting in this very question.. Is there any way to
> > declare a persistant cursor that remains open between pg sessions?
> > This would be better than a temp table because you would not have to
> > do the initial select and insert into a fresh table and incur those IO
> > costs, which are often very heavy, and the reason why one would want
> > to use a cursor.
>
> Yes, it's called a 'view' :-)
>
> Everything you can do with cursors you can do with a view, including
> selecting records in blocks in a reasonably efficient way. As long as
> your # records fetched is not real small (> 10) and your query is not
> super complex, you can slide your view just like a cursor with zero real
> impact on performance.
>
> If the query in question does not scale in time complexity with the
> amount of data returned (there is a fix processing step which can't be
> avoided), then it's materialized view time, such that they can be done
> in PostgreSQL.
>
> Now, cursors can be passed around in pl/pgsql functions which makes them
> very useful in that context. However, for normal data processing via
> queries, they have some limitations that makes them hard to use in a
> general sense.
>
> Merlin
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Russell Smith | 2005-01-20 21:38:19 | Re: index scan of whole table, can't see why |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2005-01-20 21:05:47 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |