| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project |
| Date: | 2017-01-08 23:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | 33be66e0-ee1d-70a8-9337-8587f3ba5cac@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/7/17 11:44 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> This is not overloading of SQL command - it is like annotations. It is
> smart idea, so I was not surprised if ANSI/SQL reuses it.
SHas ANSI declared that they will NEVER support := in a SELECT that's
not running in a stored function? Because if they haven't done that,
there's nothing preventing them from doing just that. If that happens
we're going to have some very difficult choices to make.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-01-08 23:42:11 | Re: RustgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-01-08 23:37:15 | Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project |