| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Weird misinterpretation of EXECUTE in PL/pgSQL |
| Date: | 2007-02-09 18:54:24 |
| Message-ID: | 3396.1171047264@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> In the presence of a comma-separated list of arguments it seems to
> intepret the EXECUTE command wildly differently. What is going on here?
Basically it evaluates the string-producing argument by sticking SELECT
on the front and handing it to the main SQL engine. So what you've got
there is a SELECT that produces two result columns, where the EXECUTE
code was only expecting to get one. (Look at exec_eval_expr in pl_exec.c)
It's a syntax error in any case; not sure if we can easily produce a
better error message, or what a better error message would be.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lar | 2007-02-09 23:17:26 | Re: BUG #2393: update fails with unique constraint violation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-09 18:00:09 | Weird misinterpretation of EXECUTE in PL/pgSQL |