From: | "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle(at)tamay-dogan(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [table partitioning] How many partitions are possibel? |
Date: | 2017-12-27 07:53:11 |
Message-ID: | 338af873d776ec0128e9fdc9ded31506.squirrel@webmail.tamay-dogan.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Am 2017-12-26 hackte Michael Paquier in die Tasten:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:04:55AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> I like to make the partitions smaller, but the documentation say, you
>> should not dare to make several 1000 partitions..
>
> Even more than a hundred may be already risky in my opinion here. The
> issue with a large number of partitioning using the pre-9.6 grammar
> comes from the planning time which sky-rockets because the optimizer
> uses a O(N^2) algorithm to consider all the partitions. The v10 grammar
> does not take care of this planning problem as far as I recall, but v11
> gets that better for partition-wise joins if my memory does not fail me.
> --
> Michael
I think on migrating to v10, but I have to backport the PostgreSQL.
Currently I am thinking about hot to backup 28 TByte of data...
Have to dump and compress table by table and thios take endless time,
especially, if I am in Estonia and the database is in Germany.
Is there already a rease date for v11?
Thanks in avance
--
Michelle Konzack
00372-54541400
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-12-27 09:09:13 | Re: [table partitioning] How many partitions are possibel? |
Previous Message | Jeremy Finzel | 2017-12-27 03:03:18 | Re: Deadlock between concurrent index builds on different tables |