Re: Connection limits/permissions, slotsync workers, etc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Connection limits/permissions, slotsync workers, etc
Date: 2024-12-28 21:24:06
Message-ID: 3380398.1735421046@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> writes:
> On Saturday, December 28, 2024 1:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Attached is an alternative proposal that groups the autovac launcher and
>> slotsync worker into a new category of "special workers" (better name
>> welcome). I chose to put them into the existing autovacFreeProcs freelist,
>> partly because the autovac launcher lives there already but mostly because I
>> don't want to add another freelist in a patch we need to put into v17. (As
>> written, your patch is an ABI break.

> Right, thanks for pointing it out. The new version patch looks good to me.

Pushed, thanks for looking at it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2024-12-28 21:49:59 Re: Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2024-12-28 19:31:03 Re: which wire protocol fields are signed int and which ones are unsigned