Re: Why is it not using the other processor?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ryan Mahoney <ryan(at)paymentalliance(dot)net>
Cc: Linh Luong <linh(dot)luong(at)computalog(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is it not using the other processor?
Date: 2001-07-05 16:22:08
Message-ID: 3368.994350128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ryan Mahoney <ryan(at)paymentalliance(dot)net> writes:
> Re: killing a process from browser, I don't think what you're trying to do
> is really possible.

If the client-side code were programmed to send a Cancel request to the
backend when the user loses interest, then the right things would
happen. I am not sure how practical that is though; does the web server
even find out about it when the user presses Stop in a typical browser?
(If not, you can hardly expect Postgres to somehow intuit what happened
two protocols away ;-).)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-05 16:23:40 Re: Why is it not using the other processor?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-05 16:05:52 Re: Changing optimizations