Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]
Date: 2007-04-27 03:52:01
Message-ID: 3367.1177645921@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I've been seeing this failure intermittently on Narwhal HEAD, and once
> on 8.1. Other branches have been OK, as have other animals running on
> the same physical box. Narwhal-HEAD is run more often than any other
> builds however.

Oh, this is interesting:

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=baiji&dt=2007-04-26%2022:00:02

Different compiler, different OS, not quite the same block number (109,
whereas IIRC all the previous examples have complained of block 104).
Is this the same physical machine as narwhal?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-04-27 03:58:19 Re: too much WAL volume
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-27 03:19:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove some of the most blatant brain-fade in the recent guc