From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: SQL Comments |
Date: | 2002-08-08 14:37:32 |
Message-ID: | 3367.1028817452@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net> writes:
> Should the version number be considered for output when psql is started
> up for interactive use? I'm fairly sure I would of caught this my self
> if a version number were there to key off of.
> Perhaps it should say something like:
> Welcome to psql, the PostgreSQL (v7.3.1) interactive terminal.
I think
Welcome to psql v7.3, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
would read more naturally ... seems like a good idea in principle
though, especially since 7.3 is going to introduce a *lot* of breakage
for the backslash commands of older psql versions.
> Maybe even a slash command which not only shows the postgres version
> that psql was compiled from but also the server version it's currently
> connected with?
> Example:
> # \v
> PSQL version 7.3.1
> Backend version 7.3.1
Maybe. Peter, any opinion about that?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-08 16:22:07 | Re: C Tigger Function Tuples |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2002-08-08 14:31:38 | Re: Does COPY need a manual Commit? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-08 21:11:38 | Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal: |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-08 13:57:22 | Re: SQL Comments |