Re: drop table cascade doesn't drop manual sequences

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: drop table cascade doesn't drop manual sequences
Date: 2007-10-14 19:39:30
Message-ID: 3360.1192390770@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> schrieb:
>> In 8.2 and up you can use ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNED BY ... to establish a
>> link that will make a manually created sequence go away when its "owner"
>> column is dropped. In 8.1 that aspect of SERIAL is hidden magic :-(

> Really no way to recognize with pg_* or information_schema.* ? I can't
> believe this, but i don't know a way...

Well, ALTER OWNED BY works by adding or removing a pg_depend entry, and
if you wanted to get down and dirty you could do that manually in
earlier releases. I wouldn't recommend it though ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoffrey 2007-10-14 20:33:03 Re: reporting tools
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2007-10-14 19:19:12 Re: drop table cascade doesn't drop manual sequences