Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date: 2021-11-15 09:47:22
Message-ID: 335B3EDC-ACCD-4312-9783-C2F8FB083D80@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 19 Sep 2021, at 20:32, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> My preferred approach would be to do this "for free" in the table
> access method, but we're a long way from this in terms of actual
> implementation. When Corey suggested earlier that we just put the
> syntax in there, this was the direction I was thinking.
>
> After waiting a day since I wrote the above, I think we should go with
> (2) as Corey suggests, at least for now, and we can always add (3)
> later.

This patch no longer applies, are there plans on implementing the approaches
discussed above, or should we close this entry and open a new one when a
freshly baked pathed is ready?

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2021-11-15 09:50:48 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-11-15 09:42:21 Re: row filtering for logical replication