Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf
Date: 2022-10-07 20:18:59
Message-ID: 3347532.1665173939@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 03:34:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Thanks. I would perhaps use names less generic than role{1,2,3} for
>> the roles or "role1" for the database name, but the logic looks
>> sound.

> Here is a new version with more descriptive role names.

There's another problem there, which is that buildfarm animals
using -DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS will complain
about role names that don't start with "regress_".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Israel Barth Rubio 2022-10-07 20:54:46 Re: Add support for DEFAULT specification in COPY FROM
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-10-07 19:44:30 Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf