From: | Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cannot declare record members NOT NULL |
Date: | 2007-09-12 20:18:54 |
Message-ID: | 334560.22089.qm@web63403.mail.re1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Why do you create an extra type for that?
> Just have your method return "movies"
Hi,
Thanks for the answer. The simple example obfuscates the fact that in reality
the table has a few extra columns that are omitted from get_movies_t.
Therefore, I cannot return "movies".
However, your answer did give me an idea: instead of declaring "get_movies_t"
as a record, I declare it as dummy table, and return that (see code at the
end).
This works, though it is *very* ugly. Any other ideas?
Thanks,
C.S.
CREATE TABLE get_movies_t
(
movie_id int4 NOT NULL,
movie_name text NOT NULL
);
CREATE FUNCTION get_movies ()
RETURNS SETOF get_movies_t
LANGUAGE sql STABLE
AS
$$
SELECT movie_id, movie_name FROM movies;
$$;
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2007-09-12 20:20:41 | Re: problems with large table |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-09-12 20:09:50 | Re: problems with large table |