Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum

From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Date: 2022-03-10 01:37:58
Message-ID: 333D1326-1EED-416F-A9AF-21C90C1C098C@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > BTreeShmemInit();
> > SyncScanShmemInit();
> > AsyncShmemInit();
> > + vacuum_worker_init();

> > Don't we also need to add the size of the hash table to
> > CalculateShmemSize()?

> No, ShmemInitHash takes the min and max size of the hash and in turn calls ShmemInitStruct to setup the shared memory.

Sorry, I am wrong here. The size needs to be accounted for at startup.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-03-10 02:17:32 RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication
Previous Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2022-03-10 01:22:37 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum