Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Guo, Adam" <adamguo(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation
Date: 2024-04-23 14:57:36
Message-ID: 3335675.1713884256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Guo, Adam" <adamguo(at)amazon(dot)com> writes:
> I would like to report an issue with the pg_trgm extension on
> cross-architecture replication scenarios. When an x86_64 standby
> server is replicating from an aarch64 primary server or vice versa,
> the gist_trgm_ops opclass returns different results on the primary
> and standby.

I do not think that is a supported scenario. Hash functions and
suchlike are not guaranteed to produce the same results on different
CPU architectures. As a quick example, I get

regression=# select hashfloat8(34);
hashfloat8
------------
21570837
(1 row)

on x86_64 but

postgres=# select hashfloat8(34);
hashfloat8
------------
-602898821
(1 row)

on ppc32 thanks to the endianness difference.

> Given that this has problem has come up before and seems likely to
> come up again, I'm curious what other broad solutions there might be
> to resolve it?

Reject as not a bug. Discourage people from thinking that physical
replication will work across architectures.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-04-23 15:03:31 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Previous Message Guo, Adam 2024-04-23 14:45:20 pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation