Re: BUG #17158: Distinct ROW fails with Postgres 14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: sait(dot)nisanci(at)microsoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #17158: Distinct ROW fails with Postgres 14
Date: 2021-08-24 14:03:26
Message-ID: 333555.1629813806@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It looks like 01e658fa74 is to blame for this.

> The test case can be simplified down to just:

> create table local (b bit);
> insert into local values('1'),('0');
> SELECT DISTINCT ROW(b) FROM local;

> Tom did have a look at this and raise the question about the
> possibility of not being able to hash in [1].

Huh. According to the thread, we discussed this exact possibility and
there's a test case verifying it ... so apparently something got
fat-fingered there.

> If it's going to be a problem detecting the lack of hashability during
> planning then maybe we can just add a hash opclass for BIT to fix this
> particular case.

Most certainly not. That would translate to a requirement that EVERY
data type have a hash function.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2021-08-24 14:11:41 Re: Postgres 9.2.13 on AIX 7.1
Previous Message Rainer Tammer 2021-08-24 11:55:11 Re: Postgres 9.2.13 on AIX 7.1