Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Chris Campbell <chris_campbell(at)mac(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-02-25 15:10:41
Message-ID: 3335.1267110641@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> I backpatched it to 8.2, which is as far as it applied fairly cleanly.
> Before that, we don't have GUC_UNIT_KB for example, so it'll be a
> different format of the patch as well. I'm not sure it's important
> enough to go back beyond that...

Hm, I'd kinda like to have it in 8.1 at least, since I'm on the hook for
support of 8.1 in RHEL5. If you don't feel like messing with a further
back-patch I can take a look.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-02-25 15:27:16 Re: Odd CVS revision number
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-02-25 15:08:29 Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete