Re: Sort support for macaddr8

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sort support for macaddr8
Date: 2019-06-03 22:04:29
Message-ID: 33232070-d6b3-4255-5db9-8c6183fcda20@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/3/19 5:59 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 6/3/19 5:03 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> 1. (This one seems like a bug.) In the little-endian case, if
> SIZEOF_DATUM is smaller than the type, I'm not convinced by doing
> the DatumBigEndianToNative() after the memcpy(). Seems like that's
> too late to make sure the most-significant bytes got copied.

Wait, I definitely was cross-eyed for that one. It's the abbreviated
copy whose endianness varies. Never mind.

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-06-03 22:05:55 Re: Sort support for macaddr8
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2019-06-03 21:59:13 Re: Sort support for macaddr8