From: | Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Deferred constraint and delete performance |
Date: | 2010-02-14 09:45:14 |
Message-ID: | 331e40661002140145l610042d8pc27c61e6c23463df@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2010/2/10 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Franck Routier <franck(dot)routier(at)axege(dot)com> writes:
> > I am wondering if deferring foreign key constraints (instead of
> > disableing them) would increase performance, compared to non deferred
> > constraints
>
> No, it wouldn't make any noticeable difference AFAICS. It would
> postpone the work from end-of-statement to end-of-transaction,
> but not make the work happen any more (or less) efficiently.
>
> What about disc access? Won't "working" with one table, then another be
faster than working with both at the same time?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-02-14 14:03:44 | Re: Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
Previous Message | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud | 2010-02-13 15:40:09 | Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk? |