Re: Very specialised query

From: Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very specialised query
Date: 2009-03-30 16:14:30
Message-ID: 331e40660903300914x1c7747d0j94be7addeb2b31f5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi.

Look, what I did mean by "symmetric" is that you don't need to make second
part of query because you will get just same results simply by

select
case when n == 1 then id1 else id2 end,
case when n == 2 then id1 else id2 end

from (
SELECT
l1.id AS id1,
l2.id AS id2
FROM
location l1,
location l2
WHERE
l1.objectid = 228000093
AND l2.objectid = 228000093
AND l1.id <> l2.id
AND l1.start < l2.end
AND l1.end > l2.start
AND l1.start < l2.start) a, (values (1),(2)) b(n)

(I may miss some border cases like when l1.start=l2.start and/or
l1.end=l2.end, but this can be fixed by adding "=" to query).

Look, You can have 4 types of intersections:
a) 1s 2s 2e 1e - 2 inside 1
b) 2s 1s 1e 2e - 1 inside 2 (symmetric to (a), if you have 1,2 from (a) you
can generate 2,1 for (b))
c) 1s 2s 1e 2e - 1 to the left of 2
d) 2s 1s 2e 1e - 2 to the left of 1 (symmetric to (c), if you have 1,2 from
(c) you can generate 2,1 for (d))

The query above gives you results for (a) and (c) and you don't need any
second part - simply add "symmetric" results.

Correct me if I miss something.

Best Regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-03-30 16:22:15 Re: Very specialised query
Previous Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-03-30 15:59:05 Re: Very specialised query