Re: Interrupts vs signals

On 05/11/2024 22:21, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 20:42, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Having spent some time playing with this, I quite like option C: break
>> compatibility, but provide an out-of-tree header file with
>> *forward*-compatibility macros. That encourages extension authors to
>> adapt to new idioms, but avoids having to sprinkle extension code with
>> #if version checks to support old versions.
>
> +1 maintaining a subset of these things for every extension is kind of a pain
>
>> My plan is to put this on the Wiki
>
> Why the wiki and not as a file in the repo? Seems like it would be
> nice to update this file together with patches that introduce such
> breakages. To be clear, I think it shouldn't be possible to #include
> the file, such a forward compatibility file should always be
> copy-pasted. But having it in the same place as the code seems useful,
> just like we update docs together with the code.

I thought of the Wiki so that it could updated more casually by
extension authors. But sure, it could be a file in the main repo too.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)