Re: Advice on key design

From: Anton Gavazuk <antongavazuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Advice on key design
Date: 2013-07-23 22:02:43
Message-ID: 3311319936507639588@unknownmsgid
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hi Jorge,

In your case it would be lpp_id as PK, and
lpp_person_id,lpp_language_id as unique constraint

Thanks,
Anton

On Jul 23, 2013, at 23:45, JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I have 2 tables, a parent (tbl_persons) and a child (tbl_languages_per_person) as follows (a language table is also involved):
>
> ------------------
> tbl_persons
> ------------------
> * per_id
> * per_name
> * per_address
>
> --------------------------------------
> tbl_languages_per_person
> --------------------------------------
> * lpp_person_id
> * lpp_language_id
> * lpp_id
>
> As you can see, there is an obvious key in the child table which is "lpp_person_id + lpp_language_id", but I also need the field "lpp_id" as a unique key which is a field that contains a consecutive number of type serial.
>
> My question is: what should I configure as the primary key, "lpp_person_id + lpp_language_id" or "lpp_id"?
> Is the role of a primary key different from that of a unique index?
>
> With respect,
> Jorge Maldonado
>
>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message JORGE MALDONADO 2013-07-23 22:28:33 Re: Advice on key design
Previous Message JORGE MALDONADO 2013-07-23 21:44:20 Advice on key design