From: | Dave Cramer <davec(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How much ram is too much |
Date: | 2007-06-11 17:22:04 |
Message-ID: | 330ACA8C-3FD0-45C1-BD56-DD68B8CC8343@fastcrypt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Andrew
On 11-Jun-07, at 11:34 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:09:42AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>> and set them to anything remotely close to 128GB.
>>
>> Well, we'd give 25% of it to postgres, and the rest to the OS.
>
> Are you quite sure that PostgreSQL's management of the buffers is
> efficient with such a large one?
No, I'm not sure of this.
> In the past, that wasn't the case
> for relatively small buffers; with the replacement of single-pass
> LRU, that has certainly changed, but I'd be surprised if anyone
> tested a buffer as large as 32G.
So does anyone have experience above 32G ?
Dave
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
> The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
> --George Orwell
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-06-11 17:51:43 | Re: Variable (degrading) performance |
Previous Message | Vladimir Stankovic | 2007-06-11 17:21:19 | Variable (degrading) performance |