Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kline <kline(dot)christopher(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather
Date: 2024-02-15 21:30:39
Message-ID: 3300728.1708032639@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Christopher Kline <kline(dot)christopher(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:42 PM David G. Johnston <
> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> "limited by" is indeed better IMO as well.

> Agreed.

Sold, I'll make it so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-02-16 02:56:31 Re: BUG #18344: Pruning tables partitioned by bool range fails with invalid strategy
Previous Message Christopher Kline 2024-02-15 20:29:06 Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for max_parallel_workers_per_gather