| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
| Date: | 2009-07-03 17:16:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3300.1246641397@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> What I've seen of Heikki's work thus far has led me to believe that
>> his reasons for rejecting the patch were good ones, but I don't
>> specifically what they were. It would be helpful, I think, to
>> reiterate them or repost links to the relevant messages in the
>> archives; it would also be great if we could get an estimate of how
>> close the patch is to being committable. Does it still need massive
>> work, or is it getting fairly close, or what? Are the issues code
>> cleanliness/maintainability, bugs, missing functionality?
> This is where we left off:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/49A64D16.8010105@enterprisedb.com
There were adjacent remarks suggesting that large other parts of the
patch remained to be reviewed, as well.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-02/msg01268.php
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-03 17:22:46 | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-03 17:05:04 | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation |