From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Scheduler in Postgres |
Date: | 2004-12-17 13:01:05 |
Message-ID: | 32g3kgF3n2p22U2@individual.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This has considerable merit.
One thing that is unfortunate about cron is that it provides little
verifyable feedback. It logs some things, sort of...
A "cron implementation using PostgreSQL as data store" would have a
wonderfully natural place to record log information in a usefully
structured fashion.
When a job runs, it would be a splendid idea to record such things as:
- Job ID (perhaps an OID, or some other candidate primary key)
- PID
- Start time
- End time
- Exit code
Given all of the above, a job might look at the logs and
self-terminate if there's another instance still running from last
hour.
Jobs that are supposed to be mutually exclusive could detect as much.
You could _attempt_ to run a job every hour, and have it decide "Oh,
I've already run successfully in the last [interval], so I'll not
bother."
None of this means forcing it into the database implementation; it
just means that it would be useful. "pgcron" sounds like an utterly
splendid idea.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "gmail.com")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/x.html
"Applicants must have *at least* five years experience with Windows
XCVIII..."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2004-12-17 13:20:36 | analyze-error: "cannot compare arrays of different element types" revisited |
Previous Message | Riccardo G. Facchini | 2004-12-17 12:51:08 | Re: Check if table exists |