Re: DRAFT 9.6 release

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Date: 2016-08-30 16:41:59
Message-ID: 32f4fcd4-a078-69d5-db71-7a3e0e1759e8@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 08/29/2016 06:24 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2016/08/30 8:00, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> Here is a preliminary draft of a 9.6 release announcement.
>>
>> Please comment, suggest, edit, make comments on the wiki, whatever.
>>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/96releasedraft
>
> In the section on scale out, I see quorum commit mentioned but it's not
> part of what's offered in 9.6. The quorum part is still being worked on:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/696/

Oh, figures the one feature I haven't tested would be the one which
isn't right. So what DID get added to 9.6? Is it still a significant
feature?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-08-30 21:28:46 Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Previous Message Chris Travers 2016-08-30 03:45:26 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?