From: | "Milen A(dot) Radev" <mradev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | milen(at)radev(dot)net, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Acting on dropped/timed-out connections |
Date: | 2005-09-08 11:29:42 |
Message-ID: | 32c009ea050908042963fbe3f7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/09/05, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz> wrote:
> # mradev(at)gmail(dot)com / 2005-09-08 11:31:25 +0300:
> > We have a daemon programme that acts as a pgsql client. It writes in a
> > DB the status of its own clients. And we have a different daemon that
> > needs to read that status information and decide upon it. The problem
> > is that the first daemon is a little fragile and from time to time it
> > crashes. I need to be able to monitor its connection to the PgSQL and
> > if it drops (times-out) to mark the status of all of its clients as
> > "unavailable" or "unknown".
>
> Do you prefer knowing that the daemon failed, or having it
> automaticly restarted the very same moment it crashes? If the
> latter, take a look at djb's daemontools, or one of its open source
> lookalikes (http://smarden.org/runit/,
> http://offog.org/code/freedt.html)
>
It's the former - in this case I'm not responsible (read "I don't
care") about the daemon. I care about the (reasonable) veracity of the
data in the DB.
--
Milen A. Radev
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Axel Straschil | 2005-09-08 12:20:24 | Re: EMS PostgreSQL Manager vs. TheKompany DataArchitect |
Previous Message | Bohdan Linda | 2005-09-08 11:25:35 | [awitney@sgul.ac.uk: Re: Access management for DB project.] |