From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>,Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>,Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>,Dilip Kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Undo logs |
Date: | 2019-02-07 01:55:57 |
Message-ID: | 32CD8482-3666-4B12-A64F-AC61312E4945@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On February 7, 2019 7:21:49 AM GMT+05:30, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:21:09AM +1100, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Correct. Originally the target was 12 but that was a bit too
>ambitious.
>
>Could it be possible to move the patch set into the first PG-13 commit
>fest then? We could use this CF as recipient for now, even if the
>schedule for next development cycle is not set in stone:
>https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/
We now have the target version as a field, that should make such moves unnecessary, right?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-07 02:03:05 | Re: Internal error while setting reloption on system catalogs. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-07 01:51:49 | Re: Undo logs |