| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename Function: pg_postmaster_start_time |
| Date: | 2024-11-06 21:33:24 |
| Message-ID: | 3295844.1730928804@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> Looking at similar functions it's clear they don't use the pg_postgres_ prefix,
> like for example pg_conf_load_time. Should this if so be pg_start_time?
No, because it's not clear what start time you're talking about;
aside from the postmaster, this could plausibly refer to the
session start, transaction start, or query start time.
Like David, I'm not seeing a good argument for changing anything
here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-11-06 22:07:35 | optimize file transfer in pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-11-06 21:21:21 | Re: FW: Building Postgres 17.0 with meson |