| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Paul Govereau <pgoverea(at)akamai(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance docs error. |
| Date: | 2000-12-30 18:05:05 |
| Message-ID: | 3295.978199505@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> It seems that the last one is correct -- or at least works for me.
> They are all correct: UNDER is the new SQL99 syntax, INHERITS is the
> traditional Postgres syntax.
Current docs do appear to be erroneous: they claim the UNDER phrase goes
where INHERIT does, which is not what the grammar thinks. I haven't
looked at SQL99 to see which is right.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-12-30 19:12:32 | Re: Inheritance docs error. |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-12-30 14:47:20 | Re: Inheritance docs error. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-30 18:15:07 | Re: pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-30 17:57:06 | Re: oid failures on Alpha solved |