From: | jcradock(at)me3(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | "YL" <elim(at)pdtnetworks(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Psql_General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql and mysql |
Date: | 2005-04-02 23:23:56 |
Message-ID: | 32912.66.63.75.161.1112484236.squirrel@secure.me3.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Clients aside, and as Christopher wrote, there are lots of differences
between the two systems. PostgreSQL supports higher-end Enterprise-level
RDBMS features. MySQL tends to be quicker. For example, and as just one
example, PostgreSQL can store and handle GIS data through PostGIS. MySQL's
OGC-compatible OGC support was introduced in the latest production-worthy
release. Both MySQL and PostgreSQL are stable and easy to use and well
supported. If you're trying to learn something, I definitely recommend
reading the documentation. If you have some specific task in mind and
think PostgreSQL might be the better fit, post a question to the list.
Jim
> Dear List,
> I'm new to Psql and very eager to learn the differences between these two
> RDBMS.
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
-----
James Cradock, jcradock(at)me3(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-02 23:32:58 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-02 23:16:32 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-02 23:32:58 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-02 23:16:32 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |