Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-29 18:19:14
Message-ID: 329.1020104354@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> What happens inside of a nested transaction, assuming we do have those
> evenually ... ?

Presumably, an error inside a nested transaction would cause you to
revert back to whatever the SET situation was at start of that
subtransaction.

Offhand this doesn't seem any harder than any other part of what we'd
have to do for nested transactions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-04-29 18:39:38 Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-04-29 18:13:44 Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction