Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-16 09:01:34
Message-ID: 32848.137.226.116.18.1071565294.squirrel@new.host.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:
> Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
> parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

That's what I said, that's what I meant.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-12-16 09:03:47 Re: YA Doc patch
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-12-16 08:07:56 Re: fork/exec patch