Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze
Date: 2005-06-21 14:32:10
Message-ID: 3283.1119364330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum,

Aside from the other stuff people mentioned, I have these things on
my to-look-at list:

* Fix pg_dump to be able to dump large objects in text dumps

* Fix inherited constraints (per discussion around 5/20)

* Fix reporting of table/column numbers for cursors (per DeSoi, 4/9)

* statement_timeout does not behave very reasonably for V3 messages

And I'd really like to see pg_role and shared dependencies get in...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-06-21 14:39:36 Re: GiST concurrency
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-21 14:14:27 Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb