| From: | chenhj <chjischj(at)163(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Page Compression for OLTP |
| Date: | 2021-02-16 15:15:36 |
| Message-ID: | 327f04be.d96.177ab693a8c.Coremail.chjischj@163.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2021-02-16 21:51:14, "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> On 16 Feb 2021, at 15:45, chenhj <chjischj(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I want to know whether this patch can be accepted by the community, that is, whether it is necessary for me to continue working for this Patch.
>> If you have any suggestions, please feedback to me.
>
>It doesn't seem like the patch has been registered in the commitfest app so it
>may have been forgotten about, the number of proposed patches often outnumber
>the code review bandwidth. Please register it at:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/
>
>..to make sure it doesn't get lost.
>
>--
>Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
Thanks, I will complete this patch and registered it later.
Chen Huajun
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-02-16 16:27:50 | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-02-16 15:15:21 | Re: libpq PQresultErrorMessage vs PQerrorMessage API issue |