| From: | Arup Rakshit <ar(at)zeit(dot)io> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why my query not using index to sort? |
| Date: | 2018-09-28 18:51:20 |
| Message-ID: | 327CBA05-3910-416D-B1E0-175C44A256AE@zeit.io |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes, I have shown the explain plan output. But in my application log the sql query prints 1.7 to 1.9 ms.
Thanks,
Arup Rakshit
ar(at)zeit(dot)io
> On 29-Sep-2018, at 12:17 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 9/28/18 11:32 AM, Arup Rakshit wrote:
>> Yes. But I thought I could improve it, so that it can be finished in 0.xx ms. It takes now between 1.7 to 1.9 ms in production.
>
> That is not what you showed in your first post:
>
> Planning time: 0.178 ms
> Execution time: 0.527 ms
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Arup Rakshit
>> ar(at)zeit(dot)io <mailto:ar(at)zeit(dot)io>
>>> On 28-Sep-2018, at 9:46 PM, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de <mailto:andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 28.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Arup Rakshit:
>>>> Also I meatn the execution time is less than I had before with enable_sort = off.
>>>
>>> yeah, but not that much. different plan.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards, Andreas
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
>>> www.2ndQuadrant.com <http://www.2ndQuadrant.com>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Sargent | 2018-09-28 18:56:49 | Re: Why my query not using index to sort? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-09-28 18:47:25 | Re: Why my query not using index to sort? |