Re: plpython function problem workaround

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Sim Zacks" <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpython function problem workaround
Date: 2005-03-15 06:41:28
Message-ID: 3279.1110868888@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Sim Zacks" <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> writes:
> I don't think that this type of solution should be discussed as an official
> patch.
> If it was, I would recommend solving the problem in source code when the
> function is passed to the translator.

Indeed, but first we need to work out what the necessary translation is.
A hack using a VALIDATOR function isn't an unreasonable way to prototype
the conversion logic.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2005-03-15 07:23:11 Re: Best practices: Handling Daylight-saving time
Previous Message Steve - DND 2005-03-15 06:35:12 Function results written to memory, then sent?