From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Archives reverse attachment order? |
Date: | 2015-10-16 13:17:32 |
Message-ID: | 32719.1445001452@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I posted a message with a batch of patches attached:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/19394.1444865029@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> and a note that the patches had to be applied in the order presented.
>> I'm disappointed to see that the web archives are showing the attachments
>> in exactly the opposite order. That could confuse someone no end ...
> In fact, it was completely unordered - the query that listed the
> attachments had no ORDER BY at all. Not entirely sure why but that seems to
> have more or less always returned them in the reverse order.
> I've added an ORDER BY on the serial column that the attachments get their
> id from, which should make it always sort them in the same order as they
> were inserted. As usual, it'll take a few hours for the effects to show
> through the caching.
Looks better now. Thanks!
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-10-19 17:07:55 | Out-of-policy CitusDB post on Planet |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-10-16 08:32:28 | Re: Archives reverse attachment order? |