From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL-spec incompatibilities in similar_escape() and related stuff |
Date: | 2019-05-23 22:10:24 |
Message-ID: | 32617.1558649424@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I propose therefore that we leave similar_escape in place with its
> current behavior, as a compatibility measure for cases like this.
> Intead, invent two new strict functions, say
> similar_to_escape(pattern)
> similar_to_escape(pattern, escape)
> and change the parser and the implementation of SUBSTRING() to
> rely on these going forward.
> The net effect will be to make explicit "ESCAPE NULL" spec-compliant,
> and to get rid of the performance problem from inlining failure for
> substring(). All else is just doc clarifications.
Here's a proposed patch for that. I think it's a bit too late to be
messing with this kind of thing for v12, so I'll add this to the
upcoming CF.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
make-similar-to-escape-null-handling-sane.patch | text/x-diff | 12.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-23 22:16:55 | Re: Remove useless associativity/precedence from parsers |
Previous Message | Donald Dong | 2019-05-23 20:15:02 | Re: Why could GEQO produce plans with lower costs than the standard_join_search? |