Re: get_constraint_index() and conindid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: get_constraint_index() and conindid
Date: 2020-12-08 18:28:39
Message-ID: 3260997.1607452119@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 11:09, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> get_constraint_index() does its work by going through pg_depend. It was
>> added before pg_constraint.conindid was added, and some callers are
>> still not changed. Are there reasons for that? Probably not. The
>> attached patch changes get_constraint_index() to an lsyscache-style
>> lookup instead.

> This looks quite reasonable, and it passes "make installcheck-world".

+1, LGTM.

> Only thing I could think of is that it maybe could use a (small)
> comment in the message on that/why get_constraint_index is moved to
> utils/lsyscache from catalog/dependency, as that took me some time to
> understand.

commit message could reasonably say that maybe, but I don't think we
need to memorialize it in a comment. lsyscache.c *is* where one
would expect to find a simple catalog-field-fetch function like this.
The previous implementation was not that, so it didn't belong there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-12-08 20:46:16 Re: Commitfest 2020-11 is closed
Previous Message John Naylor 2020-12-08 18:25:43 Re: small cleanup in unicode_norm.c